How many times, when reading about virtually anything, has
the phrase, “No one with a conviction for a sex offense is eligible,” or “No
registered sex offenders allowed,” been part of the narrative?
In everything from voting in some states to being eligible
for many government and criminal justice programs to seeking shelter in
emergency situations, those who are called sex offenders by virtue of being on
the registry are excluded.
The latest to cross my desk is this, “VCU offers chance for
jail inmates to ‘write way
out,’ ” about a program being offered by Virginia
Commonwealth University.
The program sounds great. Its goal? "To help offenders
'figure out a way to live a better life, a life that keeps them out of the
criminal justice system, a life in which they’re proud of what they’re doing,
where they’ve discovered a new life purpose or just kind of figured out those
self-sabotaging behaviors that create a lot of pain in their own life and in
the lives of others.' ”
Wow.
A secondary outcome is that those in the class, inmate and
non-inmate alike, learn “how to respect
one another in their very diverse struggles.”
The program offers something that is not normally found in
the more traditional crime to conviction to punishment path: introspection and
hope. To be eligible, applicants must be able to read and write and want to
break the cycle of criminal offending.
Oh, and they cannot be incarcerated for a sex offense – any
sexual offense – or a violent felony or burglary.
Why is this program not available to those who have
committed non-violent sexual offenses?
Would sexual offenders benefit from figuring out a better
way to live? From figuring out self-sabotaging behaviors? From understanding
the pain they have created for themselves and for their victims? It sounds like
a page out of a sex-offender therapy manual, one of the actually good ones.
Do those who have committed sexual offenses need to learn
how to respect themselves and others? Do they need introspection and hope? Can
they read and write?
What are we saying when we close off these sorts of
opportunities to those who may need it most of all? What message do we send? We
don’t want you to figure out a better way to live? We don’t want you to
understand how your behavior caused pain? We don’t want you to have self-respect or respect for others
or hope?
Everything about being on the registry says those things
already, and the registry is not working, has never worked, and will never work
in any positive way, not for those on it nor for society in general.
If having understanding of one’s own behavior and having
self-respect and having hope are desirable goals, why do we withhold this opportunity from
those on the sex offender registry JUST because they are on the sex offender registry?
Wow. I agree wholeheartedly!! I think ALL should be able to do this. Even violent offenders. Those who are violent need it the most. It would also help with reducing violence in the prisons if they offered this to ALL.
ReplyDelete