Jan, a junior executive
for a large company, was seeking approval for a new project. She was learning
how essential it was to have the friendship and support of the more senior and
influential company executives. Therefore, when Ted, one of those important and
influential persons, made teasing comments to her about her physical attributes
and flirted and joked about a sexual assignation with her, she took it in
stride, smiled, and even flirted back a little.
That was twenty years ago.
Jan is no longer with that company, but Ted is, now even more senior. Jan has
realized, along with countless other persons, primarily women, that Ted’s
comments and behavior were inappropriate and actually amounted to sexual
harassment.
Swept along with the
backlash against harassment by those in positions of power, she reported Ted’s
past behavior to his company and in the media. She was applauded for her
courage in “coming forward” and “speaking out.”
No criminal charges were
expected, of course. Ted hadn’t broken any laws, and even if he had, the
statute of limitations had expired. He had just been a bit of a chauvinist pig.
He wasn’t even sure that he remembered Jan or his behavior with her.
None of that mattered to
the company. The board of directors fired him almost immediately.
A very familiar story, it
is repeating itself over and over. The basic elements don’t vary: a man (almost
always) in a position of power; a woman (almost always) hoping to do well in
the company or the profession; many years later accusations of inappropriate
sexual behavior on his part and helplessness on hers; his very quick
firing/removal/canceling of contract by the company.
So what’s the problem?
Was he actually guilty?
Only he and she know. Why did she wait so long to speak up? It doesn’t matter.
He isn’t being charged with a crime. There are a few people here and there
raising a stink about due process and innocent until proven guilty, but no one
seems to be paying attention. One writer said that innocent until proven guilty
is a legal concept, not a societal one.
The fact that it is a
constitutional one seems irrelevant. But if we are willing to change the rules
in the absence of legal action, how soon will we be willing to change them
within the legal context? This may be the very definition of the slippery slope.
Will this run its course,
causing enough concern for enough people that some actual pushback occurs?
Or will others,
emboldened, see the perfect way to get rid of unpleasant co-workers, grumpy and
demanding supervisors, or others they just don’t like?
What could be easier? Make
a few accusations to top management, go public if necessary, and problem
solved. How can he prove he didn’t say that to you over the water cooler?
What’s important is that
you don’t have to prove he did.
The problem begins with assuming that the man is a "chauvinist pig." That's the problem with the MeToo movement, the feminist drivel that makes even mundane things like looking at a woman too long or saying a woman is beautiful is "harassment." It is simply a way for the Feminazis to control man, nothing more.
ReplyDeleteThat comment applied to only one man, "Ted." Some men are chauvinist pigs. So are some women.
ReplyDeleteNews broke just today that a woman who had been running for Congress in Kansas was forced to drop out after a 2005 federal lawsuit filed against her by a former male coworker surfaced. She vehemently denies any wrongdoing; however, the case was "dismissed after settlement talks" (as reported by Bloomberg).
DeleteI think what you're seeing in many of these cases are a lot of organizations that had fallen asleep on this and now are overreacting and rushing to judgment. I expect to see a spate of lawsuits starting next year accusing many of these organizations of faulty policies and/or failure to properly follow their policies around sexual harassment.
Generally though, we seem to be careening toward a society eerily reminiscent of James Michener's description of the Hungarian secret police in the 1950's, that sought to "incriminate every living [citizen], and many of the dead." And we're doing it to ourselves.